Sarfraz, Azza and Sarfraz, Zouina and Razzack, Aminah Abdul and Hathaway III, Donald and Thevuthasan, Sindhu and Singh-Makkar, Sarabjot and Paul, Trissa and Patel, Gaurav and Sana, Muhammad Khawar and Sarfraz, Muzna and Richter, Franz and Gonzalez, Marcos A. Sanchez (2021) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of an Emerging Therapy against COVID-19: Is Convalescent Plasma a Hidden Gem Not Yet Optimized? Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International, 32 (47). pp. 49-61. ISSN 2456-9119
sciencedomain,+Sarfraz32472020JPRI64167.pdf - Published Version
Download (638kB)
Abstract
Background: An unprecedented global effort in identifying potentially viable and emerging drugs for effective treatment of the novel coronavirus disease (2019) is being made. Of the most promising candidate therapies, convalescent plasma (CP), albeit controversial, is approved for emergency use authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The concept rests on passive immunity, achieved by administering plasma with high titers of neutralizing antibodies to reduce severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality. The aim of this paper is to assess the clinical improvement, patients’ discharge status and all-cause mortality in convalescent plasma versus standard of care COVID-19 patient groups.
Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines, a review was conducted from January, 2020, until October, 2020 employing keywords including “convalescent plasma”, “clinical improvement, “mortality”, “adverse events”, “viral load”, “dosing”, and survival.” Dichotomous data for all-cause mortality, patients’ discharge status, and clinical improvement at day 14 of treatment were meta-analyzed applying the Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) random effects model using Review Manager 5.4.
Results: A total of 627 (23.9%) patients in the CP group and 1997 (76.1%) patients in the control group were pooled. The studies were conducted in the United States, China, Netherlands, and Iran. The CP group had a lower association to all-cause mortality as compared to the control group [OR: 0.69; CI: 0.50 to 0.96; P=0.03]. Patients who received CP had higher probability of discharge during the study course [OR: 1.87; CI: 1.1 to 3.18; P=0.02]. Bias was expected in the analysis due to the stratified of study designs included.
Conclusion: Convalescent plasma therapy may be an effective and vital tool with promising historical, current, and expected clinical trial evidence of metrics such as increased safety and reduction of all-cause mortality.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Scholar Eprints > Medical Science |
Depositing User: | Managing Editor |
Date Deposited: | 31 Mar 2023 04:53 |
Last Modified: | 24 Jun 2024 05:34 |
URI: | http://repository.stmscientificarchives.com/id/eprint/1535 |